Find your solution

ESG & EU TAXONOMY

Make sustainability part of the project evidence

EEH coordinates environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting and EU Taxonomy assessment workstreams with project teams and specialist advisers.

EU TAXONOMY ASSESSMENT

Separate eligibility from demonstrated alignment

Taxonomy eligibility means an activity is covered by the framework. Alignment requires an assessment of substantial contribution, do no significant harm (DNSH), minimum safeguards and the applicable technical screening criteria.

Activity and scope

Identify the activity, boundary and reporting period.

Substantial contribution

Review the relevant objective, criteria and supporting evidence.

Do no significant harm

Assess applicable requirements for the other environmental objectives.

Minimum safeguards

Organise governance and safeguards evidence for specialist review.

Technical criteria

Record applicable requirements, versions and gaps.

Reporting and reconciliation

Link conclusions to financial inputs and document unresolved items.

Institutional context: European Commission — EU taxonomy for sustainable activities

FROM DATA TO REPORT

Define the purpose and close evidence gaps

  1. 01

    Agree boundaries and audience

  2. 02

    Collect technical and financial evidence

  3. 03

    Assign data and review owners

  4. 04

    Assess criteria and limitations

  5. 05

    Reconcile calculations

  6. 06

    Prepare the report and action plan

The engagement establishes applicable reporting obligations and review requirements. Reporting support is not an audit opinion, independent assurance or certification.

SCOPE & DELIVERABLES

Organise the evidence and financial reconciliation

01

ESG data, governance & reporting controls

Produce sustainability information that management and capital providers can trace to the underlying business.

How EEH supports you

Coordinate reporting scope, data ownership, methods and specialist review, with an action plan for material gaps.

From assessment to execution

Define purpose and boundaries → establish data owners → reconcile evidence → draft, review and track actions.

What we need to start

Energy and emissions data; environmental studies; workforce and supplier records; governance policies; incidents; financial reconciliation and review requirements.

Your agreed deliverables

Evidence register, KPI methodology sheets, data-owner matrix, reporting pack and an improvement plan with responsibilities and deadlines.

Discuss this scope ↗
02

Taxonomy assessment & financial reconciliation

Understand the difference between an activity being covered by the Taxonomy and demonstrating alignment.

How EEH supports you

Coordinate activity mapping, criteria assessment and links between technical evidence and financial reporting inputs.

From assessment to execution

Confirm the applicable activity and period → assess contribution, DNSH and safeguards → document conclusions and gaps → reconcile reporting figures.

What we need to start

Activity boundaries; relevant criteria; climate-risk evidence; water, circularity, pollution and biodiversity information as applicable; safeguards records; turnover, capex and opex mapping.

Your agreed deliverables

Activity-by-activity assessment matrix, evidence and gap register, calculation support and a review-ready report. Applicability and current disclosure requirements are confirmed for the engagement.

Discuss this scope ↗
YOUR NEXT PROJECT DECISION

What will move your project forward?

Bring the objective, the constraints and the decision ahead.

Contact us